D. C. Schindler, “The Primacy of Beauty, the Centrality of Goodness, and the Ultimacy of Truth,” chapter 3 of The Catholicity of Reason, pp. 58-84.   Overview: Here Schindler elaborates on the account of the soul’s encounter with Being that he has begun in the previous chapters. He has already introduced us to a basic question: how exactly can a finite soul have an encounter with infinite Being, without somehow failing to do justice to the latter’s infinitude?[1] In this chapter, Schindler examines each of the three transcendentals (beauty, goodness, truth) as an aspect of the encounter between Soul and … Continue reading The Primacy of Beauty, the Centrality of Goodness, and the Ultimacy of Truth

Grace, Necessity and Imagination: Catholic Philosophy and the Twentieth Century Artist The 2005 Clark Lectures at Trinity College, Cambridge Lecture 1: Modernism and the Scholastic Revival. January 20, 2005. Yet the artist’s work is inescapably a claim about reality. It is not, that is to say, a new world depending on the play of an individual psyche any more than it is the expression of a specific project of the artist’s will. ‘Poetry is ontology’, Maritain asserts in his essay on ‘The Frontiers of Poetry’, it has to do with our knowledge of being itself. Any poetic utterance, any visible … Continue reading Rowan Williams, Grace and Necessity

1. Internal vs. external interpretative frameworks (Emic vs. etic) Anderson & Dyrness show beyond any doubt that religious concerns were significant to many significant modern artists, and to the field as a whole. Let’s suppose that in the near future, the religious aspects of modern art do come to be widely recognized and widely studied—one might still wonder about how religious questions might inform or shape the scholarship and intepretations that will be produced. I have in mind the distinction between “emic and etic.” In anthropology, “emic” interpretations are offered by and for the cultural group being studied, while “etic” … Continue reading Anderson and Dyrness, Modern Art and the Life of a Culture

Here are six summary statements of ideas in Maritain’s Art and Scholasticism, each followed by related quotations from the book. (Quotations are from the 1974 translation by Joseph W. Evans online here. Also, the earlier translation by J. F. Scanlan is online here.) 1. Real communication between subject (artist/viewer/public) and object (the work of art, or other objects) is possible. The alternative is to fall into the sterility of purely subjective or purely objective modes. In aesthetic experience, we are ‘really’ making contact with the Creation and through it, with the Creator. the splendor or radiance of the form glittering in the … Continue reading Jacques Maritain, Art and Scholasticism